The authors conduct a systematic literature review and propose steps toward conceptual clarity to distinguish between 2D and 3D VR. Next, differences are investigated between 2D and 3D VR in telepresence, sense of realism, and a set of marketing outcomes important for advertisers. The authors employ custom-made VR content developed in collaboration with industry partners and tested via a field study and two lab experiments. It is found that 2D and 3D VR do not differ in their ability to elicit positive marketing outcomes, yet 3D surpasses 2D VR in evoking telepresence and a sense of realism.
The authors conduct a systematic literature review and propose steps toward conceptual clarity to distinguish between 2D and 3D VR. Next, differences are investigated between 2D and 3D VR in telepresence, sense of realism, and a set of marketing outcomes important for advertisers. The authors employ custom-made VR content developed in collaboration with industry partners and tested via a field study and two lab experiments. It is found that 2D and 3D VR do not differ in their ability to elicit positive marketing outcomes, yet 3D surpasses 2D VR in evoking telepresence and a sense of realism. Read More
Related posts:
The double-edged sword of envy: effects of envy type and regulatory focus on consumer decision-making
The Impact of Advertising On a Companys Stock Price: Conditions for Positive, Neutral, Negative, And Reverse Effects
All that glitters is not gold: exploring social selling through the eyes of B2B customers
Slow and steady or fast and furious: how movement speed in the digital medium impacts consumers’ risk judgments
Profound changes in global sourcing? The country of origin theory and its effects on sourcing decisions
The differential effects of sales control systems on salespeople’s role stressors and performance in the pharmaceutical industry