Abstract
Dairy systems in South America’s humid subtropics include grass-legume pastures in rotation with winter-summer double-cropping for silage, thus combining direct grazing with periods of effective confinement for concentrate and silage supplementation. The environmental impacts of these so-called hybrid systems remain unclear. We compiled detailed nitrogen (N) circulation budgets for four dairy systems in Uruguay stocked at 1,300 kg liveweight ha−1 but with contrasting feeding strategies (lesser vs. greater use of maize silage) and cow genotypes (New Zealand vs. North American Holstein–Friesian) and then used a farm environmental model (Overseer® Science) to partition N surpluses into losses to water and air, and to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. All systems exhibited substantial N surpluses (190–238 kg N ha−1) and moderate whole-farm N use efficiencies (31–35%). Conversely, estimated GHG emission intensities were comparatively low: less than 9.9 kg CO2e kg−1 milk fat + protein, with N2O representing less than 20% of total emissions. Nitrogen surpluses were predicted to be lost mainly through leaching (43%) and volatilisation (41%), not denitrification (10%). Loafing pads and fallow periods in pasture-crop transitions contributed the most to N losses. Feeding strategy and cow genotype effects on these patterns were minor. This study identified (i) specific spatiotemporal spots with a disproportionally large impact on potential losses of N –for instance, 12–18% of the farm area accounted for 87–90% of predicted N leaching losses, and (ii) a limited influence of feeding strategy and cow genotype. Such insights into where critical environmental impacts reside provide a quantitative foundation for future studies on intensified hybrid subtropical dairy mitigation strategies.
Abstract
Dairy systems in South America’s humid subtropics include grass-legume pastures in rotation with winter-summer double-cropping for silage, thus combining direct grazing with periods of effective confinement for concentrate and silage supplementation. The environmental impacts of these so-called hybrid systems remain unclear. We compiled detailed nitrogen (N) circulation budgets for four dairy systems in Uruguay stocked at 1,300 kg liveweight ha−1 but with contrasting feeding strategies (lesser vs. greater use of maize silage) and cow genotypes (New Zealand vs. North American Holstein–Friesian) and then used a farm environmental model (Overseer® Science) to partition N surpluses into losses to water and air, and to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. All systems exhibited substantial N surpluses (190–238 kg N ha−1) and moderate whole-farm N use efficiencies (31–35%). Conversely, estimated GHG emission intensities were comparatively low: less than 9.9 kg CO2e kg−1 milk fat + protein, with N2O representing less than 20% of total emissions. Nitrogen surpluses were predicted to be lost mainly through leaching (43%) and volatilisation (41%), not denitrification (10%). Loafing pads and fallow periods in pasture-crop transitions contributed the most to N losses. Feeding strategy and cow genotype effects on these patterns were minor. This study identified (i) specific spatiotemporal spots with a disproportionally large impact on potential losses of N –for instance, 12–18% of the farm area accounted for 87–90% of predicted N leaching losses, and (ii) a limited influence of feeding strategy and cow genotype. Such insights into where critical environmental impacts reside provide a quantitative foundation for future studies on intensified hybrid subtropical dairy mitigation strategies. Leer más
Related posts:
Assessing forage research and education needs of organic dairy farms in the United States
Optimizing fertilization strategies for a climate-resilient rice – wheat double cropping system
Iowa Swine Day: One of a kind industry opportunity
Why is nutrient cycling in food systems so limited? A case study from the North-Netherlands region
A comprehensive evaluation of the adaptability and stability of promising maize hybrids in Indonesia using different stability approaches
On-farm greenhouse gas emissions and soil carbon stocks of a soybean‒maize system